A Federal High Court in Abuja Tuesday granted an application by Senator Mohammed Aliyu Ndume, to proceed to Saudi Arabia to perform lesser Hajj.
It granted him an order to exit from Nigeria for the purpose of performing lesser hajj, Umrah, from August 1 to 31.
Ndume is standing trial on a four-count charge of sponsoring the Boko
Haram sect and withholding information which could lead to the arrest of
members of the sect from security agencies.
Justice Gabriel Kolawole said Ndume had a right to his faith and that
the Federal Government had not shown that the Senator would not return
to the country to face his trial if allowed to travel on pilgrimage.
He held that the onus was on the state to prove that releasing Ndume’s
passport to enable him travel to Saudi Arabia to perform the lesser
Hajj, Umrah, would jeopardise the efforts of the security agencies to
curb the ravaging activities of the Boko Haram sect which had caused the
death of many Nigerians in the last 14 months.
This onus, the judge said, was not discharged by the prosecution.
Justice Kolawole however warned that an accused person who had been charged before a court of law for an indictable offence and had been granted bail by the court could not rely on the provision of the constitution which stated that an accused person should be presumed innocent until his guilt had been proven.
Justice Kolawole however warned that an accused person who had been charged before a court of law for an indictable offence and had been granted bail by the court could not rely on the provision of the constitution which stated that an accused person should be presumed innocent until his guilt had been proven.
According to him, Ndume’s rights have been circumscribed by the fact
that he had been charged before a court of law and that he needed to
place verifiable materials before the court to enable the court to
exercise its discretion in his favour.
He said: “An accused standing trial is still presumed innocent until
proven guilty but this however does not mean that there was no prima
facie evidence linking him to the crimes, presumption of innocence
supposes that one who is alleged to have been committed a crime and was
arrested should be charged to court and the accused had been so
charged.”
In exercising the court’s discretion in favour of Ndume, Justice
Kolawole stated that the accused applicant had requested to attend to
his religious obligation as well as attend his routine medical checks
and noted that prosecution had not responded on how releasing his
passport to travel would prejudice this trial.
The judge said: “He had been admitted to bail and there is prospect or
certainty that the accused will attend his trial. His request was for a
specified time frame, and a mere assertion by the prosecution that the
accused will not return for his trial, cannot be taken like a magic
wand, reasonable materials to that effect ought to have been placed
before the court.
“Ndume’s application is based primarily on his personal religious faith
which the court should treat cautiously. Moreso, only the living can
perform umrah, so the submission of the prosecution that Ndume can
always perform the religious rites after his trial holds no water, as
the prosecution cannot say for certainty that Ndume would be discharged
and acquitted at the end of his trial.
“The offence for which he is standing trial carries a jail term of 10
years and there is no law which permits someone serving term to travel
for religious rites.”
Justice Kolawole ordered Ndume to file within 24 hours upon his arrival
an affidavit deposing to having received any medical attention in the
course of his trip for religious rites and to return his travel
documents back to the court immediately on arrival.
Source: This Day
Source: This Day
No comments:
Post a Comment